As we previously noted, regulatory changes aimed at enhancing corporate governance and strengthening minority shareholder rights are being implemented on an accelerated basis through: (i) the first-phase amendment to the Korean Commercial Code (the “KCC”), which addresses, among other matters, directors’ fiduciary duty to protect shareholders’ interests, the independent director regime, aggregation of voting rights of a controlling shareholder and its related parties in application of the 3% voting cap in the election of audit committee members who are outside directors, and the introduction of virtual shareholders’ meetings; (ii) the second-phase amendment to the KCC, which mandates cumulative voting and the expansion of separate elections for audit committee members; and (iii) the third-phase amendment to the KCC, which addresses, among other matters, the mandatory cancellation of treasury shares (Link). In addition to these amendments, the government has announced further policy measures, including a ban on dual listings, improvements to the M&A framework for listed companies, and additional initiatives to enhance the value of companies whose shares are trading at undervalued levels (Link).
Consistent with these KCC amendments and the government’s broader corporate governance and capital markets reform agenda, the 2026 annual general meetings of shareholders saw active shareholder proposals and various exercises of shareholder rights by activist shareholders and institutional investors. Furthermore, the proactive countermeasures taken by listed companies to reflect and prepare for the amended KCC have also drawn significant attention. Additionally, effective January 1, 2027, pursuant to the first-phase amendment to the KCC, large listed companies will be required to hold virtual shareholders’ meetings alongside traditional in-person meetings, while smaller listed companies will have the option to hold shareholders’ meetings virtually. As this is expected to increase shareholder participation in general meetings, listed companies should prepare carefully and respond accordingly.
In this regard, on May 28, 2026, the Ministry of Justice issued a legislative notice for the proposed amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the KCC (the “Proposed Amendment”) to stipulate specific details regarding the operation of virtual shareholders’ meetings (Link). The key details are as follows:
|
1. |
Specification of Companies Subject to Mandatory Virtual Shareholders’ Meetings (Proposed Amendment, Article 42-2) |
|
2. |
Regulations on Holding Virtual Shareholders’ Meetings, Notice Requirements, etc. (Proposed Amendment, Articles 42-3 to 42-5 and 42-7)
|
|
3. |
Regulations on the Operation of Virtual Shareholders’ Meetings (Proposed Amendment, Articles 42-6 and 42-8) |
In addition, the Proposed Amendment reorganizes terminology and establishes a basis for registration following the introduction of the independent director regime under the first-phase amendment to the KCC. It also refines regulations pursuant to the prohibition on issuing exchangeable and redeemable bonds involving treasury shares under the third-phase amendment to the KCC, and permits dormant companies to file business resumption reports electronically.
The addenda to the Proposed Amendment provide that the provisions relating to virtual general meetings of shareholders will take effect on January 1, 2027, the provisions relating to independent directors will take effect on July 23, 2026, and the provisions prohibiting the issuance of exchangeable or redeemable bonds involving treasury shares and the expanded methods for filing a dormant company’s business resumption report will take effect immediately upon promulgation. In addition, the Proposed Amendment mandates that the Minister of Justice determine and publicly announce additional matters necessary for holding and operating virtual shareholders’ meetings.
The legislative notice period for the Proposed Amendment runs from May 28, 2026 to June 29, 2026, and the amendment is expected to take effect following subsequent procedures, including review by the Regulatory Reform Committee and the Ministry of Government Legislation, followed by review by the Vice-Ministers’ Council and resolution by the State Council.
Notably, in the case of large listed companies for which virtual shareholders’ meetings will become mandatory, many are already initiating procedures to review internal regulations and consult on the selection of entrusted administrative agencies in anticipation of 2027 implementation, and concrete operational preparations are expected to commence in earnest in the second half of 2026. Even when proceeding by selecting an entrusted agency, meticulous preparation is required because conflicts may arise during the virtual meeting regarding: (i) the internal standards and procedures each company must establish to perform duties such as convening the virtual meeting; (ii) the reasonableness of specific criteria and details if the frequency and time of shareholder questions and statements are limited; and (iii) the adequacy of technical measures for identity verification required for attendance and participation in the virtual meeting.




