Dong-Gook KIM - Kim & Chang

Bio

Dong-Gook Kim is an attorney at Kim & Chang who specializes in providing litigation and advisory services in the areas of antitrust & competition, administrative & public law litigation, and construction & engineering disputes.

Throughout his career in public service, Mr. Kim has honed his expertise in general litigation as well as administrative & public law litigation.

Before joining Kim & Chang, Mr. Kim served as a judge for 20 years, dealing with a number of civil cases regarding issues such as real estate development and construction. He also served as chief judicial researcher of the constitution administration group at the Supreme Court of Korea for four years, supervising in all research matters.

Mr. Kim received his LL.B. in 1994 from Seoul National University, and graduated the Judicial Research and Training Institute of the Supreme Court of Korea in 1999. He is admitted to the Korean bar.

View All

Profile

Experience

Kim & Chang (2021-Present)

Advisor, Terms and Conditions Review Advisory Committee, Korea Fair Trade Commission (2019-2021)

Presiding Judge, Seoul Central District Court (2018-2021)

Advisor, Gangwon Media Arbitration Committee (2016-2018)

Advisor, Gangwon Election Commission (2016-2018)

Advisor, Gangwon Public Officials Ethics Committee (2016-2018)

Chief Presiding Judge, Chuncheon District Court (2016-2018)

Advisor, Administrative Appeal Committee, National Court Administration (2015-2016)

Advisor, Publication Committee, National Court Administration (2014-2016)

Research Judge, Supreme Court of Korea (2012-2016)

Judge, Seoul High Court (2010-2012)

Advisor, Goseong Election Commission (2009-2010)

Judge, Changwon District Court (2006-2010)

Judge, Seoul Eastern District Court (2004-2006)

Judge, Seoul Central District Court (2002-2004)

Judge Advocate, Republic of Korea Army (1999-2002)

Representative Activitiesshow

Publications/Activities

Whether It Shall Be Indicated Explicitly When the State or Local Government Owns Land or Buildings in the Maintenance Area (Supreme Court Justice No. 99, 2014)
Whether the Claim for the Payment of Value-Added Tax Refund Is Subject to the Litigation of the Parties (Supreme Court Justice No. 95, 2013), etc.