The Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) announced on May 21, 2026 that it will conduct an “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Service Market Survey” to examine and analyze transaction practices and competitive conditions among major domestic and foreign business operators participating in the domestic AI service market.
This survey is the KFTC’s third one related to the AI sector, following a survey on the “overall generative AI market” in 2024 and a survey on the “data sector” within AI infrastructure in 2025.
We provide below a summary of the background, key details, and implications of this survey. This survey is expected to serve as a milestone for the KFTC’s enforcement and future policy direction regarding AI services, a part of the AI sector most closely connected to consumers.
|
1.
|
Background and Purpose of the AI Service Market Survey
With the rapid advancement of AI technology, the incorporation of AI into everyday products and services—such as smartphones, automobiles, web browsers, and social media—is becoming commonplace. Integrating AI can promote innovation and competition, and enhance consumer welfare.
On the other hand, concerns continue to be raised about the potential restrictions on competition, such as increased market concentration, and consumer harm, such as false or exaggerated advertising using AI. Major competition authorities worldwide, including the UK CMA, France’s FCA, and Australia’s ACCC, are increasingly focusing research and analysis on the AI services segment within the overall AI value chain.
Against this backdrop, the KFTC announced its plans to conduct this survey to clearly understand the structure and competitive conditions of the domestic AI service market — which includes large domestic and foreign businesses and various start-ups — and to proactively analyze potential competition and consumer issues.
|
|
2.
|
Key Details of the Survey and Phased Plan
The KFTC solicited opinion from the industry and academia before launching the survey and plans to conduct the survey in two phases as follows.
|
|
(1)
|
Phase 1: Written survey targeting companies
|
–
|
Major domestic and foreign AI service developers (29 companies)
|
|
–
|
Major domestic and foreign providers of AI-enabled products (17 companies)
|
|
–
|
Business status of AI service operations and transaction practices related to AI-enabled services
|
|
–
|
Competitive situation in the AI service market
|
|
–
|
Method of provision of AI services to consumers, etc.
|
|
–
|
Experiences of restriction of competition or unfair trade practices, etc.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Phase 2: Written survey targeting consumers (scheduled to begin in July 2026)
|
–
|
Consumers’ AI service usage behavior
|
|
–
|
Consumers’ awareness and perceptions regarding AI-enabled products, etc.
|
|
|
3.
|
Future Policy Tasks and Implications
The KFTC plans to analyze the survey results and, through continued engagement with participants in the Ai service market and academic experts, publish a policy report titled “AI Downstream Markets and Competition” within the year.
Similar to the KFTC’s 2024 “Generative AI and Competition” report and the 2025 “Data and Competition” report, this survey and the resulting policy report are expected to focus on analyzing specific issues and presenting policy directions that reflect the particular characteristics of the AI service market.
Considering the KFTC’s existing policy direction and trends among overseas competition authorities, the following issues are likely to receive particular attention in this survey:
-
Fairness in AI integration and distribution processes: Whether the process of embedding AI into various consumer facing products involves restrictions on competition, such as bundling, exclusive dealings, or unfair refusals to deal (access restrictions).
-
Self preferencing by agentic AI and distortion of consumer choice: Whether “agentic AI”, which key foreign competition authorities are also highly focused on, could distort consumers’ ability to make rational choices through self-preferencing or non-transparent recommendation algorithm in the course of determining and consuming information and services on behalf of users.
-
Harm to consumer interests and improper data collection: Given the consumer facing nature of this market, whether there is a potential for infringement of consumer interests, such as unfair data collection using dark patterns, or false or exaggerated advertising using AI services.
|
As the AI sector experiences dynamic technological advancements, the direction and pace of regulation continue to evolve. Therefore, companies providing related or adjacent services are advised to continuously monitor the progress of this survey and respond appropriately. Furthermore, it will be important for companies to inspect their own service delivery methods and transaction status in light of the findings of this survey, and to prepare for potential risks by improving their compliance systems.
[Korean Version]