Key Takeaways
|
The Game Rating and Administration Committee (“GRAC”) announced proposed amendments to the Rating Classification Regulations and the GRAC Operating Regulations (“GRAC Regulations”) on August 5, 2025. The GRAC will hold a public commenting period to gather feedback from the interested parties on these two proposed amendments until August 25, 2025.
1. |
Amendment to the Game Rating Classification Regulations |
(i) |
The period for submitting a content update notification to the GRAC will be extended from 7 to 10 days. Additionally, the GRAC will be able to reject a notification after issuing a request for corrections, if the applicant fails to complete the required corrections within the 10-day period (Article 28, Paragraph (4) of the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations). |
(ii) |
The detailed criteria for each rating element and the standards for determining speculative characteristics have been substantially deleted or clarified (Articles 8 to 10-2, 12 and 17 of the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations). |
(iii) |
Recent changes to the Game Industry Promotion Act, such as the obligation to disclose loot box drop rates, are incorporated (Articles 13 and 15 of the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations). |
(iv) |
The annex, which includes forms, is revised to reflect changes made to the regulations. |
The following points are particularly noteworthy from the perspective of game service providers:
-
Revision of Sexual Content Criteria (Article 8 of the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations)
– |
Previously, games that depicted mild sexual themes visually, but did not include such references in audio or dialogue, were eligible for a rating of “12+.” Under the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations, these criteria will be expanded so that games featuring mild sexual references not only in visuals but also in audio or dialogue may still qualify for a “12+” rating. As a result, games that include mild sexual content through audio or dialogue, as well as imagery, can be rated as suitable for players ages 12 and up. |
-
Changes to Violence Criteria (Article 9 of the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations)
– |
Previously, games featuring player-versus-player (“PvP”) matches were rated as “Everyone,” “12+,” “15+,” or “19+,” depending on the presence and the specific nature of the losses, rewards and penalties for winning and losing the PvP matches. Under the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations, the criteria specifically concerning PvP games will be removed for “Everyone,” “12+,” and “15+” ratings. As a result, there will be more flexibility in the ratings given for games with PvP features, as long as the PvP modes do not include predatory rewards or penalties based on match outcomes, which would still be rated 19+. |
-
Changes to Horror Criteria (Article 9-2 of the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations)
– |
Previously, the criteria for horror elements were vaguely defined, stating that games would be rated “19+” if they contained excessive, graphic, or repeated depictions likely to invoke disgust or fear. The Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations will make these guidelines more specific by listing examples such as characters, visual effects, audio effects, and language that create psychological anxiety, tension, or a sense of horror, as factors that may trigger a higher age rating. |
-
Changes to Crime Criteria (Article 10 of the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations)
– |
Previously, games received a “19+” rating if they depicted criminal acts directly or if players could freely commit crimes through in-game choices. The Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations will use a broader standard, stating that only games featuring concrete and explicit depictions of crime will receive a 19+ rating. However, the annex (Annex 2: Game Content Information Description) requires a description of whether criminal acts are explicitly shown, whether those acts are player-driven, and whether there is any glorification of crime. In practice, this means that the rating process will remain largely the same as before. |
-
Assessment of Speculative Elements (Article 17 of the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations)
– |
The Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations clarifies the standards of speculativeness assessment by providing that “card games and Hwatu, which are Go-Stop and Poker-type games using standard images and rules, are subject to the assessment of speculative elements.” In this regard, games that take the form of card games but with distinctive rules, may be assigned a rating of “15+” or lower. |
-
Revision of the Annex Form
– |
The annex form has been thoroughly revised in consideration of the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations, with many formalities removed. |
– |
In Section 2, Game Content Information of the Game Content Information Description (Annex 2 Form) to be submitted when applying for game rating, a new sub-section titled “Other Speculative Elements” has been added. This sub-section requires indicating whether items obtained within the game can be converted into cash, whether they can be transferred, assigned, or gifted outside the game through direct or indirect methods to provide economic benefits, or whether they can be offered as tangible or intangible rewards (such as prizes, gift certificates, coupons, cryptocurrencies, NFTs, etc.) through distribution processes. This amendment reflects the GRAC’s position that Play to Earn (“P2E”) games are prohibited and aims to enhance monitoring of whether a game contains any speculative elements. |
Game service providers are advised to thoroughly review the Proposed Amendment to the Rating Classification Regulations and its practical impact on their current and future ratings.
2. |
Amendment to the GRAC Operational Regulations |
-
Expansion of the functions of the Rating Reclassification Advisory Subcommittee: The Proposed Amendment to the GRAC Operational Regulations expands the Rating Reclassification Advisory Subcommittee’s roles to (i) providing advice on rating decisions or objections to such decisions and (ii) providing advice on accepting the result of the Petition Review Committee regarding GRAC’s rating decision (Article 18 of the Proposed Amendment to the GRAC Operational Regulations).
-
Expansion of the participation of non-profit private organizations: The Proposed Amendment to the GRAC Operational Regulations allows obtaining opinions from non-profit private organizations (pro-public interest organizations engaging in areas such as game usage and culture, consumers, society, environment, education, etc.) when deciding or revising the rating criteria. In addition, this amendment permits including “a person with expertise and experience in game usage” as an advisor for rating decision (Articles 11 and 19 of the Proposed Amendment to the GRAC Operational Regulations).
-
Establishment of the Game Advisory Subcommittee: The Proposed Amendment to the GRAC Operational Regulations newly provides a basis for establishing the “Game Advisory Subcommittee,” which will serve as an advisory body to gather opinions on the policies and institutions related to games (Article 24 of the Proposed Amendment to the GRAC Operational Regulations).
The Proposed Amendment to the GRAC Operational Regulations, especially Articles 11 and 19, shows the GRAC’s intention to incorporate the opinions of game users into the GRAC’s policies and rating practices. We recommend closely monitoring the establishment and operation of the new advisory bodies, as well as strengthening communication with non-profit private organizations to proactively address any future developments.