Skip Navigation
Menu
Newsletters

Implementation and Implications of the ILO Fundamental Conventions

2022.04.29

Back in December of 2020, three amendments to the Labor Relations Act, including the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act (the “TULRAA”), passed in the National Assembly in connection to the ratification of the Fundamental Conventions of the International Labor Organization (“ILO Fundamental Conventions”), which had been a key national agenda item.  Then, in February and March of 2021, the National Assembly passed motions to ratify the ILO Fundamental Conventions and on April 20, 2021, the Korean government presented three key ratified conventions under the ILO Fundamental Conventions (as set forth below) to take effect one year thereafter.  Therefore, effective as of April 20, 2022, pursuant to Article 6(1) of the Korean Constitution, these ILO Fundamental Conventions have, in principle, the same effect as domestic law.
 

<ILO Fundamental Conventions (as of April 20, 2022)>

Issue Convention Key Details
Guarantee of Freedom of Association No. 87  Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize Convention
  • Guarantee of the freedom to establish, join, and operate workers’ associations
No. 98  Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining Convention
  • Prohibition of interference with workers’ and employers’ associations
  • Prohibition of discriminatory acts based on union activities
Prohibition of Forced Labor No. 29  Forced Labor Convention
  •  Prohibition of forced labor for private persons, companies, or organizations and not for public purposes


Notwithstanding, there is still uncertainty as to whether the ILO Fundamental Conventions take precedence over domestic law or vice-versa.  In accordance with the general principles of legal application, (i) the law with more specific provisions shall prevail, and (ii) if both laws are deemed equally specific, the applicable law shall be determined in accordance with the principle that the most recent law and the special law, which is applicable to a specific matter or to a specific person, shall prevail.  If challenged at the Korean courts, we believe domestic law would take precedence over the ILO Fundamental Conventions, which are quite broad and abstract.  However, though the likelihood of this is low, it is difficult to entirely rule out the possibility that the ILO Fundamental Conventions will take precedence over Korean laws based on the principle that the most recent law prevails.  Considering the foregoing at this stage, it is possible that the Korean courts may apply domestic law first and then apply the basic intent of the ILO Fundamental Conventions where applicable.
 
Meanwhile, with the ratification of the ILO Fundamental Conventions, labor-management relations are expected to encounter several changes.  First, based on the recommendations made by the ILO’s Freedom of Association Committee with regards to individual cases, the labor community is more likely to argue that matters to improve the political status of union members should be subject to collective bargaining, or that those engaged in special types of employment have the right to organize and bargain.  Furthermore, it is anticipated that the Korean government will demand additional amendments to the TULRAA to recognize platform and special types of workers as employees under the TULRAA, to recognize the principal company’s employer status for subcontractors’ union under the TULRAA, and to abolish the paid time-off system.
 
For your reference, the key amendments to the TULRAA mentioned at the top of our newsletter that were enacted in connection to ratification of the ILO Fundamental Conventions are as follows:
 

<Reference: Key Amendments to the TULRAA>

Issue Key Details
Recognition of Union Membership Status for the Terminated
  • Terminated employees, in addition to incumbent employees, are allowed to join the labor union of each company.
  • Union activities may be conducted in the business or workplace to the extent that they do not interfere with the efficient operation of the employer’s business.
  • However, in the case of terminated employees, the restriction on being eligible to serve as an officer/representative, restriction on voting for and against industrial action, exclusion in the number of union members for a single bargaining window, and allocation of the time-off limit would not apply.
Full-time Union Officers
  • The provision prohibiting payment of wages to a full-time union officer has been deleted.
  • The unfair labor practice of providing compensation to a full-time union officer beyond the paid time-off limit shall be subject to punishment, and an employer’s consent or collective bargaining agreement to provide compensation in excess of the paid time off limit is void.

 

[Korean version]

Share

Close

Professionals

CLose

Professionals

CLose